This short article is mainly for students, software engineers and those who are struggling to get a grip on the subject. In other words I will not be focusing on the theoretical side of the topic. I will first explain what Dynamic Programming means then provide several examples to demonstrate this algorithmic technique. I will be using the shortcut DP for Dynamic Programming for the purpose of brevity. Now open your heart and mind.
What is Dynamic Programming?
Historically speaking the term programming in DP refers to optimally planning multi stage processes so do not be confused. Programming in this context has nothing to do with regular programming languages or writing code. DP is an easy (to some extent), smart and efficient method for solving specific (not all problems can be solved using DP) types of complex computational problems. Candidate problems that can be potentially solved by DP are those problems which can be broken into smaller overlapping sub problems of the same type. The key idea is the overlapping between sub problems so that we solve each sub problem only once then combine all the solutions to get the final solution otherwise the solution will not be efficient at all, on the contrary Dynamic Programming makes our life more difficult if the sub problems do not overlap.
How does DP Compare to Divide and Conquer?
Dynamic Programming solves problems in a similar way to divide and conquer technique by combining the solutions of sub problems however DP is applied to optimization problems when sub problems are not independent as in the case of divide and conquer. In the case of DP sub problems share other sub problems that is why DP technique makes sure a given sub problem is solved only once by saving the solution in a table so that it can be used again. On the other hand divide and conquer introduce more work when applied to optimization problems.
Dynamic Programming versus Memoization
The term Memoization in plain English means the ability to remember something. Applying this concept to DP or Memoization means we need to save already computed values in a table (for example) in order to retrieve that value whenever needed without recalculating it from the scratch. Dynamic Programming uses a bottom up approach to solve a given optimization problem. On the other hand Memoization uses a top down approach to solve a given problem. With that said we need to understand the difference between bottom up and top down approaches so please keep reading.
Top down Approach
If the problem that we are intending to solve can be formulated recursively in terms of its sub problems (for example calculating the factorial of a positive integer) and if these sub problems overlap (sub problems are repeated over and over) then we can store the solutions in a table. Whenever we attempt to solve a new sub problem we check if the sub problem has already been solved before by simple table lookup. If that is the case then we use the stored solution otherwise we proceed in computing the new value then store it for later use. As you can see this approach is nothing but a modified recursive method to improve execution performance. If you are not familiar with recursion I encourage you to read this article that I wrote sometime ago.
Bottom up Approach
Bottom up approach is the one used in Dynamic Programming. Again the solution of a problem is formulated recursively in terms of sub problems however we construct the solution for the bigger problem by first solving the smaller problems then combining the solutions of the sub problems. A table is used to store the solutions of the smaller problems. Solutions to bigger sub problems are iteratively generated using the saved solutions of the smaller sub problems and so on until the grand solution is constructed. We will try to clarify these abstract concepts by providing real examples later in this article.
Dynamic Programming Steps
All problems that can be solved using Dynamic Programming generally follow the steps outlined below. These steps are not magical on their own which means knowing the steps is not always enough to solve a given problem. The level of difficulty is mainly determined by the actual problem itself. Trying to solve more problems helps allot but there is no magical touch (to be honest with you)
- Characterize the structure of an optimal solution
- Recursively define the value of an optimal solution
- Compute the value of an optimal solution in a bottom up fashion
- Construct an optimal solution from the computed information
Let us briefly go through the steps mentioned earlier. These bullet points are abstract concepts and hard to visualize without referring to specific problems. The first step means you need to know the value you are trying to optimize for example start asking questions like what is the maximum profit that we can get, what is the minim time that we need to spend and so on. Once you figure out what you need to optimize you need to come out with a recursive formula to compute the optimal value. In other words the optimized value should be defined in terms of smaller size instances of the same problem for example the factorial of 10 is computed using the factorial of 9. The third step is computing the optimal value by combining the solutions of smaller sub problems. These solutions are generated in a bottom up approach as discussed earlier. The last step is constructing the solution because calculating the optimal value is not the same as indicating how to get that value. One table is usually used to store the solutions to sub problems and another table is usually used to store back pointers to construct the final solution which is the actual procedure to come out with an optimal value.
We are done with part 1. In the next part I will explain the first Dynamic Programming problem “Assembly Line Scheduling Problem” discussed in “Introduction to Algorithms” by Thomas H. Cormen. Any comments or feedback is appreciated. Thanks for reading.Search Terms...
- understanding dynamic programming
- how will you find x29 using divide and conquer technique
- dynamic programming understanding
- undestand dp